ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM BASED EDUCATION ACCORDING TO LEV SEMYONOVICH VYGOTSKY
Abstract
This article is a theoretical study of Vygotsky's idea of zone of proximal development. Its aimed at finding out of its relevance to contemporary educational practices that are increasingly complex. Through the description of the background of the emergence of this idea the author concludes that the idea of zone of proximal development is still relevant in modern education, especially to support the educational practices that are friendly toward student’s individual differences at school. Vygotsky's criticism of the practice of levering in schooling is a warning for teachers and education practicioners to consider learning interventions based on individual students' backgrounds especially their mental development differences so that education can be an effective medium to help children's growth and development optimally.
References
Anonim, “Dalton School”, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton_School), diakses 7 Juli 2019.
Boring, E.G. (1950), A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Burks, B.S. (1928), A Summary of Literature on the Determiners of the Intelligence Quotient and the Educational Quotient. Bloomington, IL: The Public School Publishing Co.
Burt, C. (1927), Mental and Scholastic Tests. London: P.S. King and Son.
Chaiklin, S. (2003), ‘The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction’, in A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageev and S.M. Miller (eds), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–82.
Coy, G.L. (1930), ‘A study of various factors which influence the use of the accomplishment quotient as a measure of teaching efficiency’. Journal of Educational Research, 21, 29–42.
Daniels, H., Cole, M., and Wertsch, J.V. , (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gould, S.J. (1981), The Mismeasure of Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hines, H.C. (1924), A Guide to Educational Measurements. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Joravsky, D. (1989), Russian Psychology: A Critical History. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kozulin, A. (1990), Vygotsky’s Psychology: A Biography of Ideas. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Kozulin, A. (2003), ‘Psychological tools and mediated learning’, in A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev and S.M. Miller (eds), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–38.
McCrory, J.R. (1932), ‘The reliability of the accomplishment quotient’. Journal of Educational Research, 25, 27–39.
Merton, R. (1968), ‘The Matthew effect in science’. Science, 159 (3810), 56–63.
Peterson, J. (1926/1969), Early Conceptions and Tests of Intelligence. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Rahmani, L. (1973), Soviet Psychology: Philosophical, Theoretical, and Experimental Issues. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.
Rudik, P.A. (1932), ‘Bourgeois influences in the psychological measurements of the intellect’. Psikhologiya, 3, 3–7.
Scarborough, H.S., and Parker, J.D. (2003), ‘Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ, and psychosocial problems from grade 2 to grade 8’. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–12.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986), ‘Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy’. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Terman, L.M. (1921), The Intelligence of School Children. London: George G. Harrap & Co.
Terman, L.M., Dickson, V.E., Sutherland, A.H., Franzen, R.H., Tupper, C.R., and Fernald, G. (1923), Intelligence Tests and School Reorganization. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
Torgerson, T.L. (1922), ‘The efficiency quotient as a measure of achievement’. Journal of Educational Research, 6, 25–32.
Valsiner, J., and Van der Veer, R. (1993), ‘The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations’, in R.R. Cocking and K.A. Renninger (eds), The Development and Meaning of Psychological Distance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 35– 62.
Valsiner, J., and Van der Veer, R. (2000), The Social Mind: Construction of the Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Veer, R. (2007), ‘Vygotsky in context: 1900–1935’, in H. Daniels, M. Cole and J.V. Wertsch (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–49.
Van der Veer, R. (2011), Lev Vygotsky, Continuum Library of Educational Thought, London: Continuum.
Van der Veer, R., and Valsiner, J. (1991), Understanding Vygotsky: A Quest for Synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van der Veer, R., and Valsiner, J. (1994), The Vygotsky Reader . Oxford: Blackwell.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1930/1997), ‘On psychological systems’, in R.W. Rieber and J. Wollock (eds), The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 91–107.
Walberg, H.J., and Tsai, S. (1983), ‘Matthew effects in education’. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359–73.
Wells, F.L. (1927), Mental Tests in Clinical Practice. Yonkers-on Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
Wilson, W.R. (1928), ‘The misleading accomplishment quotient’. Journal of Educational Research, 17, 1–10.
_0012.jpg)
